Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Going for BigLaw then in-house when I burn out. Haven’t received aid info from Yale but it’ll probably be around 100k. Also waiting to hear of I get accepted into the Doctoroff program at Chicago.
I’m assuming this is between Hamilton and Ruby. I know Ruby’s a lot more but I’ve heard CLS is pretty much a BigLaw factory do not sure how to value that. Interested in hearing y’all’s thoughts.
Thanks in advance.
I’m assuming this is between Hamilton and Ruby. I know Ruby’s a lot more but I’ve heard CLS is pretty much a BigLaw factory do not sure how to value that. Interested in hearing y’all’s thoughts.
Thanks in advance.
- heythatslife
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:54 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
First off, congrats!
I think Chicago and Columbia are functionally equivalent schools. Doesn’t Ruby include a stipend as well? I’d take that and run.
I think Chicago and Columbia are functionally equivalent schools. Doesn’t Ruby include a stipend as well? I’d take that and run.
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
UChi is also a biglaw factory. The marginal difference in their initial biglaw placement is mostly made up in Chicago's advantage in clerkships. We've had a lot of X vs. Ruby threads, but barring an extremely personalized situation that makes Chicago untenable, the answer is the same: just take the Ruby.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Thank you very much! It does come with an extremely generous stipend (20k/year) so I am leaning towards them, thank you for your input.heythatslife wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:28 amFirst off, congrats!
I think Chicago and Columbia are functionally equivalent schools. Doesn’t Ruby include a stipend as well? I’d take that and run.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
I’m a non-citizen so I wouldn’t be able to clerk, but glad to hear that the difference in placement is only marginal! Thank you for your input.Stranger wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:33 amUChi is also a biglaw factory. The marginal difference in their initial biglaw placement is mostly made up in Chicago's advantage in clerkships. We've had a lot of X vs. Ruby threads, but barring an extremely personalized situation that makes Chicago untenable, the answer is the same: just take the Ruby.
-
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:22 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Wait Ruby is full ride + 20k/yr? And Chicago has Nando's? Easiest decision in the world
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Haha well I've never tried nandos but good to know. Also not to sure of how well I'll do in law school so at the very least I'm still considering Yale, that 20k stipend seems like an amazing deal though.ffffffffff wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:32 amWait Ruby is full ride + 20k/yr? And Chicago has Nando's? Easiest decision in the world
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Hopefully someone who went there can chime in, but my understanding is that Chicago has a pretty robust support network for their Rubys. Your career goals aren't things like the Solicitor General's office or impact litigation or prestigious academia where Yale really has advantages. Corporate biglaw and in-house counsel are entirely in reach for you if you can avoid utterly flaming out in law school (and Chicago will work to help make sure you don't). This isn't the choice between a stipend at WashU and Berkeley at sticker, which for your goals, would be a much harder call. Your goals are generic, and for generic goals, the differences between Chicago and Yale are small enough that you should follow the money.CainandAbel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:32 pmHaha well I've never tried nandos but good to know. Also not to sure of how well I'll do in law school so at the very least I'm still considering Yale, that 20k stipend seems like an amazing deal though.ffffffffff wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:32 amWait Ruby is full ride + 20k/yr? And Chicago has Nando's? Easiest decision in the world
I know it would only help out a handful of people a year, but I really feel like this subforum should have a sticky that says, "JUST TAKE THE RUBY!"
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Haha understandable. Apologies if variations of this question have been asked before. To me, this is a very crazy problem to have and I just didn't know for sure how to solve it.Stranger wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:19 pmHopefully someone who went there can chime in, but my understanding is that Chicago has a pretty robust support network for their Rubys. Your career goals aren't things like the Solicitor General's office or impact litigation or prestigious academia where Yale really has advantages. Corporate biglaw and in-house counsel are entirely in reach for you if you can avoid utterly flaming out in law school (and Chicago will work to help make sure you don't). This isn't the choice between a stipend at WashU and Berkeley at sticker, which for your goals, would be a much harder call. Your goals are generic, and for generic goals, the differences between Chicago and Yale are small enough that you should follow the money.CainandAbel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:32 pmHaha well I've never tried nandos but good to know. Also not to sure of how well I'll do in law school so at the very least I'm still considering Yale, that 20k stipend seems like an amazing deal though.ffffffffff wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:32 amWait Ruby is full ride + 20k/yr? And Chicago has Nando's? Easiest decision in the world
I know it would only help out a handful of people a year, but I really feel like this subforum should have a sticky that says, "JUST TAKE THE RUBY!"
That institutional support is really cool to hear about. The email mentioned it but didn't actually mention it but I've read a little about it online, didn't know it would help so much in doing well academically as opposed to just helping you find a job down the road.
Thank you once again for your help!
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Doing well academically only matters for the purpose of getting a job (and later jobs) down the road.
- BlendedUnicorn
- Big Tent Energy
- Posts: 14286
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:13 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
I don't even think this is that hard of a call if you want to be a prof but if the goal is biglaw it's a no brainer.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Got it, thank you !BlendedUnicorn wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:03 pmI don't even think this is that hard of a call if you want to be a prof but if the goal is biglaw it's a no brainer.
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
yes, that was my point. (Responding to "didn't know it would help so much in doing well academically as opposed to just helping you find a job down the road.")
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:01 pm
Re: Ruby v. Hamilton v. Yale
Oh haha got it, yeah then that makes sense. Thank you LolNony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:50 pmyes, that was my point. (Responding to "didn't know it would help so much in doing well academically as opposed to just helping you find a job down the road.")
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests